very subtle only maybe an artist will notice.
the two cables have different tones though. the picture quality wasn't changed very much except for the benefits of the 80 dollar cables color technology. the shorter cheaper cable has superior bandwidth, and if you know what that does for gaming with a 4k tv, then you need it. i had a high speed sony cable before it about 5 years old now. HDMI 2.0 transfers at 18 Gbps that allows 60 FPS. This is a dangerous article as it doesn’t mention that 8Gbps hdmi will limy you to 30 FPS. Now the picture is grainey 4k the seller says it's not the splitter but what I can find the splitter supports HD 1.3b, supports 1080p, supports 250MHz/2.5Gbps what is 1.3b? Never heard of it is it that old? Seriously are these specs enough to support 4K?ĭo you know any specific manufactures to look out for in particular who are trying to sell the HDMI 2.0 Cables/4k HDMI cables that do not actually support 4k?Īlso I am a little confused, are you saying that manufacturers of these cords are actually saying they are hdmi 4k cords and they do not support it - or are you saying that you can get the same kind of cord for way cheaper and the manufacturers are trying to pull a fast one by jacking up the price of the 4k cables? Hi, hope someone can help, recently bought a hdmi 3 way port splitter for my 4k TV and DVD player plus 4k cable TV. Replace with a splitter that supports HDMI 2.0 at least. The 1.3b Splitter isn’t enough for HDMI 4K.
0 kommentar(er)
